I know it’s a bit late, but if Osama wasn’t killed the other day a lot of people would still be talking about it. I myself had no idea about this whole Royal Wedding affair until the Rabbi spoke about it in shul this past shabbos.
By Anonymous
It’s a lovely morning today. The sky is bright and blue, the trees are kinda green, the sun is shining and all of America are bleary-eyed after waking up at the wee hours (wait, was it just me?) to witness the royal wedding of His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales, and former commoner-turned-duchess-soon-to-be-QILF, Catherine “Kate” Middleton. So while the world watched and tweeted and dabbed their eyes and watched some more, it became apparent to those watching carefully that this was no historical event on the world stage, grand-scale celebration in the UK, or obvious chance for royal-wannabe Americans to get on board and stickybeak into the posh world of aristocracy and royalty for a moment. No, it was not. Instead, it turns out it was an International Conspiracy of the highest order, orchestrated by Orthodox Jewish High school and seminary principals worldwide, in cooperation with the Global Shadchonim Alliance and the International Conference for Shmiras Eynayim – to teach us how it’s done. Yup, I am blowing that whistle and reminding you all that the royal wedding was nothing short of an International Tznius Conspiracy, designed to remind us all that Kol Kevudah Bas Melech Penima (“The Glory of the King’s Daughter is from Within”, a verse in Psalms often quoted by aforementioned high school teachers to illustrate the importance of dressing and behaving modestly) is a living and breathing concept – and who better to showcase it on than the beautiful, not-goyishe-looking-at-all Kate Middleton?
Let’s see, shall we…
They Wear Hats: I think the first time I picked this up was in Four Weddings and a Funeral, and it was subsequently followed up in every piece of British chick lit I ever consumed as a lass. Apparently, hats are worn to weddings. This applies to British women, but hell, what do I know, maybe it applies elsewhere? Maybe this is a genuine gentile custom and I, in my shortsighted Jewishness, know nothing of it? Either way, the royal guests are all bedecked in the perfect shul-going Bar Mitzvah-and-Ufruf ensembles. Wide brimmed hats, little bits of netting, demure hairstyles, and oh! The suits. So many ladies in suits a Boro Parker would be proud. Because did you know your clothing isn’t shabbosdike unless it is a suit? (Female, for the record). This I learned from a friend of mine who hailed from, all of places, an ultra-Orthodox enclave in Canada (Montreal or Toronto, obviously I don’t know the difference).
The Queen is in Yellow – (at least it’s not red): The red-is-a-no-no tznius concept is one which has oft been debated among the Orthodox who range from Ultra to less Ultra. (No one else cares, to be honest). After all, what is less modest about a bright purple dress than a red one? Well, the fact that the Sugababes sang about it, for starters. Anywho, I never subscribed to the no-red theory, but I have many lovely lady friends who are adamant that red makes one more attractive to men, and hence should be avoided at all costs. In accordance with the International Tznius Conspiracy as witnessed today, the royal wedding clearly displayed that yellow is indeed permitted. And what a lovely sunshiney yellow it was, Your Royal Majesty!
The Boys are in Uniform: Along with teaching girls about Kol Kevudah and whatnot, the boys are all over the Yidden in their Yiddishe Uniform. We’re talking Yarmulkes and Tzitzis and rainbows and gumdrops and sunsets and ponies. Oh yeah, and wearing woolen undergarments in the heat and a constant head covering that makes you stick out like a sore thumb… WAIT! What am I complaining about for my poor male brethren? I’m the one who has to sit in a skirt, perfecting the art of exiting vehicles with class at all times, cover myself up in the heat and – what was that? Oh, right, cover my HAIR every moment following my nuptials, actually. Kinda like these nuptials, in fact. Ladies in hats and suits and – what was that? Oh right – next:
The Dress: THE DRESS! THE DRESS!! Allow me to wax lyrical for a moment, if I may, on the same concept that has flooded the blogosphere for the last many hours or so, and indeed rightfully. Kate’s dress. Um. Okay, allow me to compose myself, because those INTERNATIONAL TZNIUS CONSPIRATORS SURE KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING, and created just the right amount of gorgeousness and beauty that now EVERY SINGLE WOMAN AND GIRL AROUND THE GLOBE is now lusting after a wedding dress that is BASICALLY FIFTY PERCENT TZNIUS which is around forty three percent more tznius than most other wedding dresses in the known universe outside select gemachs in Brooklyn and Chinese sweatshops that service religious communities elsewhere.
Put it this way: The girl had sleeves. And just like every other Modern Orthodox girl out there who peruses copies of Modern Bride and Vogue Bride and all those other magzines I’m not allowed to read because it would coin me as desperate and I am so not of that type, of course not, why would I want to get married and wear a white dress and have everyone look at me anyway, but I know these magazines have pretty dresses in them and ANYWAY, these girls buy dresses and then do the classic shul-appropriate ADDITION OF LACE SLEEVES. AND THAT’S WHAT THE PRINCESS DID, THAT’S WHAT KATE MIDDLETON DID, SHE WAS TZNIUS, YOU GUYS.
Okay. Whew. Those international tznius conspirators knew exactly what they were doing. Taking the essential prototype of every tznius dress – basic bodice so it looks just like the other dresses out there, adding lace sleeves (generally with opaque lining, but let’s ignore that for now shall we, the point is THE ESSENTIAL STYLE WAS ONE THAT CAN EASILY BE ADAPTED FOR TZNIUS and oh what do we have next? Yup, let’s watch the next generation or seventeen of girls grow up with wedding dresses JUST LIKE KATIE’S. Making them shul-appropriate, easily tzniusified with a nice Russian seamstress, and EVERY ORTHODOX GIRL’S DREAM. From the little kids with pillowcases on their heads to the nebbach-she’s-thirty-and-still-teaching singles languishing in the basements of Brooklyn.
She wore a veil too, you guys. And we all know that a veil is essential because the chuppah is considered one part of marriage and for all you know she’s supposed to cover her hair then even though the papers haven’t been signed yet and the wedding night was not yet consummated (though of course no one in England cared this time that their bride was not a virgin, lucky the besulah part of the kesubah was irrelevant when you have an archibishop conducting your ceremony, they’re sneaky ones those International Tznius Conspirators…) so we all know the bride should have something, even a small clip or headband or veil or – oh, what was that – why yes, a tiara would do me just fine. Oh, pretty of all pretties. And frum of all frummies.
It was only appropriate that this conspiracy be backed up by all the important oracles of the universe of garmentry. Let’s begin with the Project Runway producer (apologies to all fashionistas who are appalled at my inability to recall his name), who was summoned by the ladies providing commentary on ABC, where I found the clearest stream thanks to Hulu (yeah, they even made sure it was kosher for all to watch, instead of being on the chas-vsholom-never-in-my-house Tes Vuv, it was livestreamed on the oh-so-kosher-because-I-get-Daf-Yomi on computers, laptops and tablet devices. Genius, really). Tina Brown, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters – they all got in on the act, discussing the loveliness, the demureness, the beautiful clean and classy MODESTY
The Nails: While the rest of the world noted with glee that the future QILF had fingers that needed a bit of prodding to become mekadesh with the royal ring, I was too busy focusing on her short and clean nails. Um, does that not scream MIKVAH NIGHT LAST NIGHT? We know it does.
Yarmulkas: While cooking up the International Tznius Conspiracy this morning, the associated organizations thought they’d have a little laugh and throw something else in the mix for all the boys watching. The assertion that the hard-core frum of the gentlemen are only appropriately frum/chassidishe/shtark/adherent-to-the-law-of-Moses-in-whichever-way-the-establishment-sees-fit when they are garbed in black skullcaps has often been challenged by those of the religious persuasion who attempt to emphasize any skerrick of individuality remaining by garbing their heads in orange silk, knitted watermelons, woven rainbows and corporate logos or puff-painted-velvet proclaiming controversial sayings – anything to look different. Turns out the archibishop and his merry men had it all sorted too, with the yarmulkas on stage in pink, orange and every type of pretty pretty silk that would make a yeshivah bochur kvell. The word has been spoken, yidden. Rip out that Twitter kippah, don your Yechi yarmulkah, and let the good times roll.
No Kiss at the Altar: Everyone waited for the kiss. It was supposed to happen, just like in every other frothy-white-wedding with an archibishop presiding over two of the most important people in the country at an altar. What? Oh, right. See, the majority of the public universe who don’t grow up in frum homes where a wedding a night is standard in the weeks after Purim before Pesach, after Shavous before the three weeks, and immediately following Tisha B’av, are kinda unfamiliar with wedding proceedings. They don’t start humming along to the brochos before the Rabbis have even gotten up to get the kibbud – because believe it or not, weddings are a little scarce in most people’s world, at least until they enter that bizarre window that starts at 18 in Orthodox worlds but closer to 28 in the general world, where friend after friend gets married weekend after weekend (if you’re frum, Tuesday after Tuesday) and the tick-tocks get louder and faster. So the standard wedding is the one portrayed by Hollywood, the shmutzicke purveyor of all that is evil and shtus and kelippah in this world – where a nice big smooch follows the wedding.
But let us not forget the producers of this show are not from that stretch of southern California where all the Jews landed to take on the goldene medina – no, they are from the Association of Orthodox Jewish High school and Seminary Principals worldwide, in cooperation with the Global Shadchonim Alliance and the International Conference for Shmiras Eynayim – and they made sure the kiss did not take place in public. Instead, the chosson and kallah ran off into a ‘private room’ – yeah, we know they can’t say Yichud Room on television – and took just that little bit too long. The part where the mother of the bride is standing outside the door worried, the bridesmaids are exchanging smirks, and some daring friend of the groom gives up and knocks on the door as everyone tries desperately to wipe out of their minds the images of their dear newlywed couple engaging in the legendary rumored “yichud-room-shtup”.
The Kiss: As the world waited with bated breath for the royal kiss, money was on chupas nidah from one point of view when it finally happened: They finally smooched – though most would call it a royal peck. Hereby disappointing the entire population of the Western world – including many who smell a little funny and buy commemorative mugs in red and blue with future kings on it – and cementing the approval of commentators who agreed that tznius is the word of the day. Following the party line of the Association of Seminary Principals, who are adamant that action on the outside means there’s not a helluva lot of action happening in the bedroom – Wills and Kate reminded us that tonight’s mitzvah night may be getting very steamy indeed.
So thanks, international conspirators. You had the cultural commentators on board, commenting that the neckline was a bissel pas nisht for a future Queen and that the sleeves made it oh so modest and lovely. You showed us what a real frumme, tznius couple looks like. And honestly, I’ve got to say: I WANNA BE LIKE KATE ON MY WEDDING DAY!

“money was on chupas nidah”
Just so you know, William is not the prince of wales, that’s his father, he’s merely 2nd in line to the throne.
Dave
Actually, Charles’ title is Charles, Prince of Wales, so his children are titled Prince William of Wales and Prince Harry of Wales. Similarly, the Duke of York’s children are Princess Beatrice of York and Princess Eugenie of York.
are you single?
From the way she writes I’d say she’s desperately single.
Or maybe satirical. You know. Keeping with themes and all.
no, a nurans right, she does sound that way
Funny, isn’t it, how people would dare to write satire on a website that’s titled… wait, what does it say in that box? Oh, right, Satire in the title. Huh.
– The Lady Who Wrote This Post
even with all that about it being satire, for some reason its too see-through (feelings wise-/too attached to the post)- like those women who wear white thin cotton robes to the beach after they play in the water
Sounded that way by accident or design. Either way the impression is very clear.
What’s wrong with that? I liked the post and was just curious about it. People should sound like what they are anyway.
lol
what, no mention of how painfully rail thin the young lady was? why, she seems to be a perfect size 2! sigh. halevai by alles! nu, now that is a bracha that surely all the tznius seminary principals, et al, can support, no?
Qilf??? Are you a l*sbian?
I was wondering about that use of QILF as well.
Anyway for the guys, it’s a toss up between William and Harry. They both have a nice look, albeit very different.
Bill didn’t get the hair in the family.
1. I love the post.
2. I love Qilf
3. You should use a pen name so we can enjoy your other posts.
Agreed. QILF is awesome. I’d advise you to shorten your posts though and I second adding a pen name.
Thank you, two lovely people. I will indeed take you up on that suggestion, I am now A Lady and yes I stole that from another website but that’s okay because now that I’ve admitted my shameless plagiarism it’s somehow okay.
And yes, QILF is a reference to the topic of the remainder of that day on Twitter, but I can’t really expect everyone to know that, can I? Instead they will just assume I am making a personal comment relevant to the bride… oh dear.
Technically, she should be a PILF. By the time she gets to be queen, she may be more of a cougar than a QILF.
Excellent point. I like PILF which is gender neutral, and is easier to pronounce than HRHILF.
actually the orginal printing of Jane Austens books were attributed to ‘A Lady’.
it was definitely not tznuis to write her actual name at the time.
(when pride & prejudice came out it was attribed to ‘the same author as sense & sensibility)
so its not really from another website – its from jane austen
much nicer.
his official title is Prince William, Duke of Cambridge. The prince of wales is prince charles, his father
Thank you for the correction, kind anonymous, but luckily I have the genius of Wikipedia to rely on, who told me that until April 29 2011, Wills was indeed the Prince of Wales. But thanks for checking up on me. It’s important to get our royal facts right. (Seriously)
– A Lady (who wrote that post)
Wikipedia told you that Prince William was the Prince of Wales?? Huh???
The Prince of Wales is a total bestowed (its not automatic) on the heir apparent. Prince Charles was made Prince of Wales when he was 9 years old. Needless to say, since he’s still the heir apparent, he’s still the Prince of Wales.
The women wear hats because they’re in church. St. Paul said for women to cover their hair in church and all Christian women (Protestants and Catholics — the Brits are Anglicans) have done so up until about 40 years ago.
When I was a kid (now you know how old I am) I wore a veil (a mantilla) in church. Grown up women could wear a veil (think Jackie Onassis at the Kennedy funeral) or a hat. The lace veil (the requirement is only to cover the hair, not the face) was cheap and could be bought for about $2 and kept in a little plastic thingie you kept in your purse. You just took it out and bobby-pinned it on before going into the sanctuary. The hats were expensive and often very fancy. [Gershwin: “I could write a sonnet, about your Easter bonnet.”]
After Vatican II everybody stopped wearing hats in church, except that women often (but not always) wear hats and veils at weddings (and the bride always wears a veil) and women wear veils when being presented to the Pope. I have never been presented to the Pope and haven’t worn a hat or veil in church for a couple decades. It wasn’t a bad look, though. Certainly a lot more attractive than some of the trash you see now. [Was that an unChristian thing to say?? 🙂 ]
I should say that women still cover their hair not only at weddings but also other other highly formal occasions that involve being in church. For example, all little girls making their First Communions will wear a veil.
At this point this is basically just tradition, though, not a religious requirement. How and when this requirement faded away I have no idea because when I was a kid this was 100% rock solid (for example, if a woman remembered she left her purse in the sanctuary, she’d pin her mantilla back on before going back in to get it) and now it’s totally non-existent and I don’t recall that there was ever any formal announcement about it.
ill marry u!!
We almost completely avoided that expensive and arrogant sham of a wedding by not turning on the news most of the weekend. I did see the bride’s dress, though, and got angry that she stole the dress idea I had harbored for years. Mine will be more tznius.
Can someone please explain to me why so many women are so into wedding gowns? From my perspective, you wear it one time, and no man cares what it looks like because youre taken! I go to weddings just to be nice. I hate em.
Because a wedding gown is the most expensive and beautiful outfit a woman will wear during her lifetime; it’s also worn on (hopefully) one of the best days of a woman’s life.
Hey, nobody hates the Royals more than the Irish, but why was it an “arrogant sham of a wedding.”?? It’s the monarchy that’s an arrogant sham, but the wedding was real.
The royal family are independently wealthy and have no business using taxes to pay for what is essentially a party – especially during a recession and several wars which their military is involved in. While the couple looked lovely, I can’t help but wonder if their marriage will last.
The wedding itself was paid for by the Royal family and the Middletons. The “country” paid only for the security (which was enormous). Is that absurd? Sure. But the taxpayers pay for security for the all the royal family (and plenty more) all the time. In exchange they get a national spectacle. If they don’t want it they could easily vote to get rid of the whole thing. They don’t because it’s the only thing left to remind them they once had a great empire. As for “wondering if their marriage will last” — that could be said of any marriage.
I read recently that the government makes back in tourism related tax revenues roughly double what the government spends to maintain/protect the royal family and all their property. So its a good investment for the people of England.
Wait..the country pays for the wedding?
Yes – but wasn’t it worth it? For the dress? For the dress, Dena? Well, no. The British taxpaying public pay the Queen (one assumes it filters down to the rest of the royals) £43m every year. Presumably, the wedding was payed for out of this – and they didn’t exactly have to pay rent for Westminster Abbey. The thing is, no-one cares because Kate and Wills made everyone love our (constitutional) monarchy again.
Yes – but wasn’t it worth it? For the dress? For the dress, Dena? Well, no. The British taxpaying public pay the Queen (one assumes it filters down to the rest of the royals) £43m every year. Presumably, the wedding was paid for out of this – and they didn’t exactly have to pay rent for Westminster Abbey. The thing is, no-one cares because Kate and Wills made everyone love our (constitutional) monarchy again.
Then there was Princess Beatrice’s hat / toilet seat / Flying Spaghetti Monster / Cthulhu / antlers
HILARIOUS!!!!!!!
Erm no mention of pippa????
I laughed so hard I cried. Please, whoever you are, write more posts!
The difference between Toronto and Montreal is the same as someone educated and you (vast). Everybody knows that Toronto is the English part of Canada and Montreal is its French part.